Monday, October 12, 2015

DEINDUSTRIALIZATION AND CRIMINALIZATION

BY STUDENT

During the 1970s, drug abuse was declared a public enemy by former President Nixon, which was the start of the infamous war on drugs.  The intention of the war on drugs was to have a zero tolerance attitude toward any possession and use of any illegal substance in the United States.  The war on drugs was implemented to protect the nation from illegal drug abuse and to punish those responsible for distributing them.  However, it can be argued that this ‘war on drugs’ was one of the examples of deindustrialization and criminalization of people of color in the United States.  Although the war on drugs was decades ago, it still remains relevant in today’s society especially regarding the topics of deindustrialization and criminalization.  In places like my neighborhood of Brooklyn, NY, the evidence of criminalization against people of color is relevant the same as it was during the war on drugs decades prior.  
According to Gilmore, the stem of deindustrialization and criminalization is what is called the Prison Fix.  The Prison Fix explains the idea that during the 1970s, there was such a high surplus of capital in the nation’s budget, which proposed the idea to build prisons in underpopulated areas.  This building in the underpopulated areas was such a good investment in the eyes of the capital because now with this investment, more money will come out of the land than what was put in.  With the building of jails and prisons, new commodities will be introduced to this underpopulated area.  The building of jails will bring new jobs for people in surrounding areas, thus creating more residents in the area which increases the value of the area. Also, local towns will increase in tourism bringing more money to small businesses and communities.  Overall, these building of jails and prisons would bring a lot of positive results in these underpopulated areas.  But before all this could have begun, the prison needed one main component to start running: prisoners.  This is where the issues begin. 

The government wants to portray the prison system as a system of rehabilitation and protection against criminals of all types of offense backgrounds from the functioning community.  However, some evidence can make one question the true motives behind the building and running of jails and prisons in the United States.  According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, from 1978-1988, the population of State Prison Inmates went from 300,000 to 600,000.  By 2000, the rate was almost at 1,200,000!  However, with such a high jump in prison population, criminal activity seems to have been declining during these years.  How is this possible? This stems the idea of criminalization.  The need for prisoners in these newly built prisons brought about harsher sentences for drug offenses ranging from 2-10 or more years for small drug offences.  And the racial demographic of the majority of the arrestees during this time: people of color, mainly African American males.  Why you may ask?  Many factors could include the socio-economic status as well as low educational attainment.  It can be argued that low socio economic status and lead to a higher tendency to commit crimes.  If someone is charged for a crime, even a small offense charge, the lack of educational attainment could possible make the one charged not aware of certain rights they possess, such as the right to remain silent or the right to an attorney, even if they cannot afford one.  Because of these factors, it is easy to over charge people in this demographic, thus the high prison rates of people of color.  Sadly, this only creates the never ending cycle in communities like Brooklyn, New York where this is prevalent.  So many children are growing up without their fathers in their lives, not because of abandonment, but for being incarcerated. This lack of male role models in communities such as this has been shown to lead to high crime rates among the youth in this community, thus having this cycle continue.  That is why the “war of drugs” and the deindustrialization and criminalization has such an impact on today’s society.  It is important that the country takes a look at their policies and realize that the capitalist functioning of our society it not benefiting us as whole, but only the very few and wealthy.  It is important to help all in society, no matter the race, socioeconomic status or other factor but just as human beings.

10 comments:

  1. I really agree with you. I think this so called war on drugs, is like a domino affect. The fact that males were taken away from their families started a trend of their children ending up in jail, and then their children end up in jail. It's like a snowball that keeps getting bigger and bigger as it goes down hill. If we take away the father figure, it's then up to the streets to raise the child, and then they fall into the same trap as their father.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree with Jeffrey as well. Taking these father figures away does start a domino effect where the children ends up being raised in the same situation that their fathers grew up in. This leads to them following in the same footstep and becomes a never ending cycle. We need to help break this cycle and this "war on drugs" doesn't do that.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Not to sound repetitive, but I also agree with basically everything said in the post. The "war on drugs" creates a terrible cycle that couldn't/cant be stopped unless the laws changed. If the factor of not having a father figure is the main issue the cycle wont end. Minorities will continue to get incarcerated, causing kids to grow up without fathers and then follow the same path.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I actually live in a town that consists of two prisons in Elmira, NY. The main prison is what we call the prison "on the hill" and it is actually what employs probably 50% of my town's people, just an estimate. I don't live in the biggest city so a lot of the kids I went to school with had parents whose fathers or mothers were correctional officers. I see firsthand the "idea" that it generates economic activity but in sounding redundant, I do agree with the entirety of this post. Many of the inmates in the prisons are African Americans and their families actually travel from where the inmate is from, which is typically NYC, to be able to visit them and they live in "Hawthorne Court" which is considered the projects in the East side of my town and extremely dangerous. If the prison system actually functioned as a rehabilitation system, things like offering some types of classes or helping inmates find jobs or join programs after time spent in prison, especially because of petty drug offenses, the U.S. would see better days. Also, removing petty drug offenses like marijuana offenses that are under a certain weight considering 23 states legalized medical marijuana and 4 states legalized recreational marijuana; this would contribute to children being able to have fathers and mothers in their lives and I agree with the educational barrier on those being charged not being aware of their rights. The entire system is corrupt it is a shame that those of color are targeting and blamed.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I agree with the point that the war on drugs has an impact on our society and is causing the increased criminalization and incarceration of minorities. The war on drugs was implemented to protect our nation but all it's doing is hurting those who live in the U.S. I don't think that the lack of a father figure would force kids to do crimes. Children have a sense of what is wrong and right, they don't need a father to teach them that. There are children who grow up without a father figure and don't turn to a life of crime.

    ReplyDelete
  7. The war on drugs like everyone mentioned is definitely a domino effect. They implement laws based on drugs that are attached to a particular race that is higher than "white drugs". this then sends black/latino to prison which takes them away from their family, for the most part when they get out they are unable to secure a good job if any job at all.

    ReplyDelete
  8. The fact that prison populations are growing while criminal activity was declining is what stuck out most to me. I believe the war on drugs was too harsh and locked up people for a long time just for petty crimes. Touching on how prison is like a revolving door I believe was key because majority prisoners who are released from prison end up back there.

    ReplyDelete
  9. You have a great introduction and it helped to understand the prison fix way better. Woah, isn't that idea ridiculous. It's silly. After awhile of classes and reading for years, I've come to the conclusion that the government is just selfish. A lot of their actions do not consider the well being of others, and most importantly the well being of the poorer minorities. It's upsetting. I do not see how this idea and system could be beneficial to anyone but them. If anything, it removes residents from the towns and cities. Wouldn't these imprisoned residents be the workers in the town that wants to raise money ? Where those imprisoned the bread winners for their families ? Now how are their families ? I believe that the government selfishly care just about money and the well beings and the prison fix is one of the many examples where the government has put their own (ever heard of the saying the rich getting richer, and the poor getting poorer) needs first.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I think that the reason for the fact that most drug arrests are on minorities is because of the fact we still associate crime with place. When you see he number of where all these arrests are made they are mostly in low-income, minority neighborhoods. In my opinion from what I saw growing up white kids did do more drugs than the minority kids but yet when they were caught by the police it would be a problem for mom and dad to handle while for minorities most likely you were getting fined or taken in to the police station.

    ReplyDelete