DEINDUSTRIALIZATION
by E.P.
Our class discussions
lately center on the most populous urban areas of the country: New York, San
Diego, Los Angeles. Especially when talking about New York, and with the
majority of the major city centers listed, deindustrialization and the loss of
manufacturing jobs happened decades ago stretching from the 50s onward into the
70s. These jobs then shifted to the peripheries and later shifted to the center
of the country, where manufacturing was the staple job provider until the turn
of the century. I grew up in Binghamton, New York where the effects of
deindustrialization are seen every day. On the edge of the Rust Belt (the
region where old factories are now rusting away, includes Wisconsin, Illinois,
Ohio, Michigan, Pennsylvania and parts of New York) my area still lingers in a
state of nostalgia, wanting the return of steady paying jobs that can support a
middle class family. Deindustrialization’s
economic, social and psychological effects continue for decades after plants
close and across generations, affecting the worldviews of younger people who
never worked in steel mills or auto plants (The half-life, 2016). Thus, it was
these angers still lingering over the passing of NAFTA and other free trade
agreements and union fracturing that led these states to give Donald Trump the
presidency and let these grievances be known. However, the Rust Belt is not a
homogenous white lower-middle class area, it is filled with decrepit city
centers inhabited by Latinos and African Americans so what of them?
Chicago,
Detroit, Pittsburgh, and Scranton are all major Rust Belt city-centers with
diverse populations including Latinos. Yet every state of the cities voted for
Donald Trump, yet Hillary carried these downtown areas, but why? According to a
Slate article, industry has long
taken place outside of city centers for decades, but deindustrialization hits
both the poor inners cities as well as the better off suburbs of the area (Even
in 2016, 2017). Thus as factories shut down, local Latinos and local whites are
effected by the economic and psychological strains of deindustrialization.
However, as suburbs attain a similar standard of living as before, the inner
city is neglected. Gary, Indiana was the industrial heart of the Chicago
metropolitan area, and now is home to large vacant buildings, a posterchild of
white flight (population has dropped by 100,000 since 1960 and is now 84%
African-American) (Effort to preserve, 2017). Without capital coming in these
buildings are falling apart, and conservative pundits point to neglect and
laziness of welfare ridden minorities as the reason why, while pandering to
white voters on the need for a return of manufacturing. These city centers such
as Gary, Indiana or Scranton, Pennsylvania voted for Democrats, and were
overlooked by political analysis and the parties alike.
The
Rust Belt is home to Latinos and African-Americans alike, and they are both hit
equally hard and more severely by the effects of deindustrialization. However,
time and time again they are left out of the conversation of
deindustrialization. NY Senator Chuck Schumer commented on the presidential
race with, “For every blue-collar Democrat we lose in Western Pennsylvania, we
will pick up two moderate Republicans in the suburbs in Philadelphia”(Even in
2016, 2017). Yet where is the concern of losing minority blue-collar workers in
the Rust Belt, or the minorities depending on government assistance while
occupying the shells of factories and decaying industrial neighborhoods like in
my hometown of Binghamton? Latinos
have always been the subject of anti-communist and socialist attacks here in
the United States. But if this election cycle shows the evils of nationalist
populism bent on attack world capitalism and free trade that has hurt blue-collar
white in the Rust Belt, it also showed a case where the good of nationalist
populism. As Trump filled stadiums of red hat wearing fans screaming for a wall
aimed at stemming the growth of Latinos in our country; a socialist Jew filled
stadiums of diverse crowds in the same Rust Belt stricken areas. Bernie Sanders
portrayed a side of the Rust Belt that is yearning for more than just a wall to
keep more immigrants from stealing jobs, he promised to undue years of neglect
by political pundits with the revolutionary idea of socialism. Latinos were
among the first to speak up about socialism; it was the Young Lords last point
of their plan, a socialist society (13 Point Plan, 1993). Thus, as
deindustrialization attacks the heartland of America, and enrages white voters
to rally behind a racist populist, progressives in this country need to include
Rust Belt minorities in their plans to fight back, and bridge the gap between
the urban rusting centers, and the suburbs who once relied on those factories.
Works Cited
13 Point Program and
Platform of the Young Lords Party. (n.d.). Retrieved Feburary, 19, 2017, from
http://www2.iath.virginia.edu/sixties/HTML_docs/Resources/Primary/Manifestos/Young_Lords_platform.html
Effort to preserve
Gary architecture gaining momentum. AJ Latrace. Retrieved February 19, 2017 from http://chicago.curbed.com/2017/2/17/14641904/gary-historic-preservation-architecture-tour
Even in 2016, Democrats Carried Rust
Belt Town Centers. Why?. Henry Grabar. Retrieved February 19, 2017 from http://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox/2017/02/17/even_in_2016_democrats_carried_rust_belt_town_centers_why.html
The half-life of
deindustrialization: Why Donald Trump is just a symptom. Sherry Linkon.
Retrieved Feburary 19, 2017 from http://www.salon.com/2016/08/19/the-half-life-of-deind_partner/
Your article post is quite interesting. I like how you showed both the republican side and democratic side of how Latinos are being affected. I agree that deindustrialization is affecting the Latino population because of the decrease in jobs. It is completely unfair that different places around the nation like the Rust Belt are being deindustrialized. It is pretty clear cut that president trump doesn't want many Latinos if not any Latinos present in the United States.
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed your article. I love that you incorporated the effects of deindustrialization that currently have an impact on your home town. I think the fact that you personally related to Latinos and the deindustrialization problems that they are facing, is the reason this article is so intriguing. I also really like that you included how both Republicans and Democrats influence Latinos and their different opinions about them.
ReplyDeleteThis was a really interesting article post. Ive never heard of the rust belt before and its crazy that there is something actually called that. I also liked how you incorporated the political parties in this article and related it to people who we know today. Something should be done today so that there isn't a such thing called a rust belt. Maybe possibly inviting industry back into our nation with tax incentives will revive those areas and bring back jobs. This will give the people who live by those areas an opportunity to work again if they don't have a job.
ReplyDeleteYour article introduced the era of the Rust Belt to me for the first time in a very descriptive way. I enjoyed the political connections made with the devastation some Latino/African Americans are facing with the decline in economy and the outcome of the presidential election, in addition how the outcome will affect our future. I also liked how you mentioned the potential reasons as to why certain areas across our country made the decision to vote Trump or Hillary. Do you think if the principles of these candidates campaign were shifted in a slight other direction concerning the people affected by the Rust Belt more that the outcome would have been different?
ReplyDeleteThanks for the comments, I never knew that most people who live outside the Rust Belt might have never known there was such a thing named that glad I was able to introduce this to you. I am also in full agreement that if the Democrats had made a major policy shift in listening to the Rust Belt voters we might not be living under a Trump Presidency. By simply relying on the coastal liberal populous city-centers I believe Democrats weren't able to show empathy towards Rust Belt voters people who used to reply on Democrats for their pro-union stances. But lately Republicans have picked up the mantle of protecting American labor and it gravely cost our country.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed your article. I never heard of the term Rust Belt before and I am glad that I was able to learn about it. Your article also touched upon on Latinos both republican and democrats are affected by the Rust Belt or capitalism. This article shows an insight of how capitalism is currently working in our society and how before Trump was elected some people thought to turn to socialism. I especially liked this article because it helps me, have a framework of how to explain our current presidency to future generations.
ReplyDelete