Thursday, October 13, 2016

TRANSNATIONAL URBAN LATINIZATION

BY R.B.

Growing up my family use to send money back to the Caribbean very frequently. I never thought to much about it. But the more I think about it they were sending remittances and it made a big difference. Many individuals come to the United States primarily in large cities to work and send money back to their home countries. You can see this quite often among the Latino population. This is exemplified in the documentary, The Sixth Section. As I watched the documentary I was fascinated with what Grupo Union had accomplished. Which brought me to ask the question how much of a role does remittances play in the development of the global south? And are immigrants working overseas in the developed world necessary for the global south to develop? I aim to prove how important immigrants are to globalization and urbanization of the global south. 

In “National and Transnational Urban Systems” by Sassen Saskia, Sassen talks about this “bottom up” system. Where the minority population commonly overlooked, in fact are the ones that have the power, and are making an impact and contributing to urbanization. As oppose to the “top down” system where the people in authority that being the politicians having more of an influence because they have the resources and ability to influence policy. But as The Sixth Section showed us remittances make a big difference. For example, Grupo Union were able to accomplish many things in Mexico, i.e. building a stadium which is an economic symbol. According to (TimeLabs) “Mexico receives $24.4B in remittances from immigrants in the United States. This accounts for 1.905% of Mexico’s national GDP of $1.5T. The average person from Mexico remits $1.9K back annually.” Thus proving the importance for immigrants to continue to send money back home. Many of these countries depend on the cash flow. Politicians have recognized the importance of remittances. As a result, politicians are meeting more frequently with immigrant union groups overseas that send remittances back to their home country. 

It is evident that immigrants overseas play an imperative role in the development of countries in the global south. Remittances sent to home countries allows these local villages commonly forgotten about by politicians to develop. Due to the lack of economic opportunities in the global south immigrants play a major role in cash flow. As much as we try to ignore it, the truth of the matter is that, not only are these immigrants necessary for the growth of underdeveloped nations, they play a major role in our society as well. They are doing the jobs American’s do not have the time to do due to the rapid growth of globalization and urbanization. In my opinion immigrants and the people belonging to the “lower class” in this globalized world we live in are some of the major key players in urbanization allowing globalization to occur.
 Sources:Program, By. "Journalism & Media." RSS. N.p., n.d. Web. 4 Oct. 2016. Rebala, Pratheek. "This Map Shows Where Immigrants To The U.S. Send The Most Money Home." Time. Time, n.d. Web. 5 Oct. 2016. Sassen, Saskia. Cities in a World Economy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge, 2000. Print.


2 comments:

  1. I also agree that remittances definitely play a huge role in the development of the 'global south'. Just last year in 2015, remittances in Mexico overtook the revenues for the oil industry in Mexico for the first time ever. In fact, Mexico is the largest receiving nation for remittances from the United States. According to the Pew Research Center, for the year 2016, it is estimated that remittances to Mexico will reach nearly $28 billion. What I think is pretty spectacular is the resiliency of hard-working Mexican immigrants here in the U.S. As we saw in the documentary The Sixth Section, through multiple deportations and economic struggles, the members of Grupo Union were still able to come together to provide for their families and the community members of their hometown. I think that without remittances, most of the people living in these rural areas would still be struggling significantly, as would their economy. The remittances do not just provide a means for income, they also provide that sense of tight-knit community through things like the baseball stadium, for example.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I.V.:
    I can relate because my mom would always send remittances to my home country and it wasn't till now that I realized how much affect it would have in my home countries development. My uncle would use the money to build houses to sell so that my family can make profit. In a third world country a house can meet a lot to a family that doesn't have one so we would help and make money back

    ReplyDelete